The problem with both the German and US responses to the survey is that it's clear that people in both countries are conflating what is easy with what is useful. The reality from a carbon emission standpoint is much different. Here are the impacts on CO2 reduction on a kg per person basis:
- No more plastic bags 3 kgs
- Switching off standby modes 53 kgs
- Regional and seasonal foods 80 kgs
- Fuel-efficient driving 340 kgs
- No more meat consumption 450 kgs
- One flight less per year 680 kgs
- Modern heating and insulation 770 kgs
One way to look at the disparity between the survey results and the impact is that lots of people are willing to sacrifice little stuff or small personal changes as long as the effort or inconvenience is minimal.
People aren't clueless, they are lazy and maybe a bit self-indulgent. They are ordering their choices in a form of self-justification. Plastic bags are easy and highly visible signs of virtue. It's like solar panels on your roof; people would rather spend money on them rather than efficient heating and cooling or insulation, because they are also visible virtue signals.We are all going to have to make sacrifices and it's important to understand that the easy ones aren't going to make much of a difference.
Nobody is even willing to acknowledge that what is convenient to them is actually producing a lot of carbon. The Germans like their meat so it's not so bad. The Americans want to fly so it's not so bad. It's all sort of the reverse of virtue signalling.
No comments:
Post a Comment