Sunday, June 19, 2016

DAILY QUICK READ - JUNE 19, 2016

Trophy Hunting


Can the U.S. take action to control trophy hunting in Africa?  It will be a challenge, but this report provides a great starting point for a discussion of the real (positive or negative) impact of trophy hunting on conservation.

In a new report, Missing the Mark, the Democratic staff of the House Committee on Natural Resources charges that Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Namibia and South Africa are providing U.S. officials with little evidence that taxes and fees raised from trophy hunts targeting lions, leopards, elephants and rhinoceroses provide conservation benefits and have an overall net-positive impact on imperiled species.

“You can’t make the assumption that these countries are using the funds for conservation. You have to have the proof,” said Matt Strickland, a member of the committee’s Democratic staff. “U.S. hunters are responsible for taking a lot of animal trophies from Africa and we want to make sure the Fish and Wildlife Service is doing its job in permitting trophy imports and Americans aren’t contributing to the decline of certain species.”



Alligators Are Ingrates


Saving an apex predator from extinction was an environment success, then we decide to move into their neighborhood.  The results are occasionally bad for humans, but disastrous for the gators.

The American alligator once neared extinction. By the 1950s, demand for hides and uncontrolled hunting in the southeastern United States had almost wiped out the species after a 200 million-year run on planet Earth.

Three decades later, alligator populations were fully recovered, “making it one of the first endangered species success stories,” according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The reemergence of the alligator came at the same time the human population also grew, both in size and sprawl, creating a dynamic with an unavoidable outcome: human and predator interaction.



Saving the Amazon


Critical to reducing the impact of climate change.  Just a beginning here, not a binding agreement.

The declaration, with 7 objectives, was signed by scientists, conservationists, government officials, academics and development specialists attending the conference. Some of the signatories included: The Ministry of Environment of Peru; Amazonas State Environment Secretariat of Brazil; the Loreto Region Direction of Production, the fisheries authority in Peru; the Wildlife Conservation Society; and several others. Key to the declaration is its assurance that it aims to work toward international agreements in which the interests of all and the sovereignty of each country are respected, and the integrity of the environmental system, particularly in the Amazon Basin, is protected.

The objectives of the declaration include: to expand the integrated river basin ecosystem management approach; to promote interdisciplinary and intercultural research agendas; to strengthen fisheries management at adequate scales; to ensure the proper management of Amazon Basin wetlands; to understand better the potential environmental impacts of development investments on the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Amazon Basin; to build an informed, committed, and empowered constituency for the conservation of the Amazon Basin; and to cooperate in good faith and with a spirit of solidarity in the implementation and further development of the objectives.

Going after deforestation in the Amazon by going after those who really gain from it.  This is how you save the environment.  Follow the money….

That was when Azeredo had an idea that even the staunchest ruralist opponents have recognized as brilliant. The state of Pará has about 250,000 ranches, and there are hundreds of supermarket chains with more than 80,000 stores spread across the country. But the link between those cattle ranches and the supermarkets is formed by just a few dozen medium and large slaughterhouse operators that are responsible for butchering the cattle and distributing the resulting “cattle products” – companies such as JBS, Bertin (later bought by JBS), Marfrig, and Minerva.

Azeredo’s plan was to turn those slaughterhouse operators into guardians against deforestation.
Prosecutor Daniel Azeredo’s idea was simple and effective. The MPF had caught slaughterhouses buying deforestation cattle and applied fines totaling two billion Brazilian real (about $500 million). But an even more powerful instrument of pressure was the fear that buying illegal beef provoked in large supermarkets, such as Pão de Açucar and Walmart. With the possibility of being sued, they would rather avoid beef from Pará, which would be perhaps a fatal blow to the state’s slaughterhouses.

Azeredo and the MPF’s quest to stop illegal deforestation for cattle ranching also benefited from the pressure that Greenpeace was putting on multinational brands such as Adidas and McDonald’s in Europe, companies that bought large quantities of leather and beef. The Greenpeace campaign, called “Farra do Boi,” warned against the use of raw materials from deforestation cattle coming from the Amazon. The fear of the damage that this could cause to their reputations made these brands threaten to stop buying cattle products from sources in the region. So when Azeredo offered the agreement known as the “Beef Agreement,” the large slaughterhouses signed it – and thereby became responsible for the supervision of the farmers who were their suppliers.



20% of Plants In Danger


Climate change creating stress.  Disease and damaging insects more prevalent.

Climate change might not be the primary cause of a plant dieback event, but it certainly can tee up such events by putting plants under environmental stress. A mild winter might allow a damaging beetle to survive in much higher numbers, and if there is even moderate drought, then stress along with the primary cause of damage could trigger massive landscape-scale plant death so great that it is easily seen from space, Prof McElwain says.




Just Save One



Amir Rahim was on a tuna fishing boat about 180 nautical miles off the coast of Karachi, Pakistan, when he saw an olive ridley sea turtle trapped in a polypropylene woven bag, the Huffington Post reported. The turtle was struggling to swim with the bag dragging behind it. 

Rahim jumped into the water fully clothed to help the turtle. He wasn’t able to free the turtle while in the water so his crew mates helped him bring the turtle on board. They cut the bag off of the turtle and released it back into the water.

Rahim is a trained observer for the World Wide Fund for Nature—Pakistan. The Huffington Post reported he had “seen plenty of turtles entangle in floating fishing nets,” but had never seen one trapped in a floating bag.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Will Resume Shortly

 Taking a break from blogging.  Worn out by Trump and his fascist followers, Covid-19 pandemic fatigue, etc.....